Windows 9: What Will It Look Like?

Microsoft Charms

Once upon a time, Windows provided a reliable source of revenue for Microsoft. But with Windows 8 reportedly losing market-share, and millions of people refusing to move from the aged Windows XP to a more modern platform, the future of Windows seems a little cloudy.

In order to regain momentum, Microsoft is working feverishly on a version of Windows that will convince everybody still on Windows XP, Vista, 7, and 8 to upgrade posthaste. But what will this new platform, which would likely hit the market in 2015, actually feature? What will it eliminate from Windows 8, which received middling reviews upon its release in late 2012?

Click here to find Windows-related jobs.

According to The Verge (which cited “Windows enthusiast site” Winbeta), the next version of Windows—which everybody is calling Windows 9, at least for the moment—won’t include Charms, a series of icons that allow Windows 8 users to search, share, access the Start screen and settings, and send data to connected devices such as a phone or printer. While some of that functionality will reportedly find its way into Windows 9’s taskbars, Charms themselves will end up in history’s dustbin of dead tech.

Why kill Charms? Microsoft apparently wants to make Windows 9 much friendlier to mouse and keyboard input than Windows 8, and the elimination of this touch-centric feature could prove a key way of going about it. The decision could also reflect Microsoft’s desire to make Windows 9 more of a “desktop first” product, given the lukewarm reaction to the Start screen, where Charms reside.

Over at Neowin, Brad Sams suggests that Windows 9 will boast virtual desktops, emulating a feature already present in Mac OS X and Ubuntu.

The biggest question is whether Microsoft can count on Windows as a major revenue driver for years to come. Today, with mobile devices and the cloud taking center-stage in most folks’ computing lives, there’s arguably a declining need for a robust desktop operating system. Microsoft hasn’t been totally blind to that fact: Windows 8 was meant to give the company an aggressive entry into the tablet market—but two years later, iOS and Google Android continue to dominate that segment.

If Windows 9 represents a decisive shift back to the desktop, that could allow Microsoft to re-solidify its presence among the core Windows audience. But how much of a “core Windows audience” will exist in five years?

Related Articles

Image: Microsoft

Upload Your ResumeEmployers want candidates like you. Upload your resume. Show them you’re awesome.

Comments

  1. BY jelabarre says:

    Has MS at all considered the other issue; that Win8 & such will not run on HW that XP ran on? After all, we’re still mired in the depths of an economic depression, and people do not have the money to throw out perfectly functional hardware on the whim of MS. Granted, I’m sure there’s some level of pressure from MS’ various OEM partners to **force** consumers to buy those machines they can’t afford to buy. Why should you be allowed to spend your money on food or government-mandated insurance when the OEM’s need to buy new yachts?

  2. BY jason says:

    I don’t see any company that has confidential info is willing to install a cloud based OS and also have to pay rent for software. They would also have to pay rent to use cloud storage, which they don’t know where it’s stored. Also, if internet connection is lost, they’ll be stranded with access to nothing. It’s great that the core is free..except you’ll have to pay for everything else, like a start menu, codecs, themes, ect…that’s why I like windows 7 or older, pay once – owned.

    Is MS trying to take over the Linux server backbone by forcing companies to use there cloud servers?

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>