The Top Secrets of Corporate Recruiters

Posted In Job News

Candidates are often befuddled by the corporate recruiting process. Especially when they make a conscious effort to play by the rules, only to discover they weren’t even considered for an opening because their resume fell into a black hole.

What to do? “Candidates have to be bold and take some risks,” says Lou Adler, founder of The Adler Group, an Irvine, Calif., company that trains and advises corporate recruiters. “Otherwise, your resume will get lost in the abyss that is corporate recruiting.”

So, to understand some of the realities of corporate recruiting, here are some of its secrets.

Secret No. 1: The Most Qualified Candidate Rarely Gets the Job

Companies hire candidates for their personality and cultural fit — not for their skills, advises Abby Kohut, a New York-based recruiter, speaker and author of 101 Job Search Secrets. In fact, Kohut says successful IT candidates usually satisfy only about 75 percent of the technical requirements.

“Companies hire the least risky candidate with a great attitude and passion for technology,” says Kohut. “So focus on the requirements in the top third of the job description and spend the rest of your time explaining why you’re a good fit for the culture.”

Secret No. 2: Go Around Human Resources

Although recruiters often discourage candidates from contacting line managers, the successful candidates usually network their way into the company.  “No matter what recruiters tell you, it’s okay to go around human resources and contact the line manager,” Kohut says.

Secret No. 3:  Recruiters Ignore Confidential Resumes

When recruiters are inundated with resumes, they don’t need to spend valuable time tracking down and scrutinizing mysterious candidates.

Secret No. 4: Don’t be Afraid to Submit Your Resume via Fax or Certified Mail

Although IT professionals might scoff at the idea of using vintage communication, recruiters say sending your resume via snail mail or fax can often reach your target audience.

Secret No. 5: They Read Resumes from the Bottom Up

Some recruiters read resumes from the bottom up to evaluate a candidate’s career progression, so make sure your resume conveys a compelling story from either direction.

Secret No. 6: Only 50 Percent of Openings are Posted

Recruiters frequently source and fill unadvertised job openings, so it pays to build relationships proactively.

Secret No. 7: Recruiters Look for Reasons to Exclude Candidates

Recruiters look for reasons to exclude candidates from the hiring process, not include them,” says Freeman. “So be careful what you say during interviews, because you don’t want to cast a shadow on the wall.”

Secret No. 8: They Prefer Fresh Applicants

Theoretically, recruiters search the database before posting a position, but kulling stale resumes can be unproductive. To make sure you don’t fall off the radar, refresh your posted resume every week and reapply to suitable positions.

Secret No. 9: Recruiters Vet Candidates on the Internet

It’s not a rumor. Recruiters check-out candidates on the Internet and float their names by the current IT staff to avoid an avalanche of adverse references down the road.

Secret No. 10: They Can Say No, But They Can’t Say Yes

Recruiters can’t say yes, but they can screen out unsuitable applicants. So treat them with respect and don’t under-estimate their ability to get you in front of a hiring manager.

About Leslie Stevens-Huffman

Leslie Stevens-Huffman is a business and careers writer based in Southern California. She has more than 20 years’ experience in the staffing industry and has been writing articles, blog posts and moderating the Dice Discussion Board since 2006. In addition to her writing pursuits, Leslie is a part-time instructor for UC Irvine Extension and a member of the Human Capital Institute’s Contract Talent Advisory Board. Leslie has a bachelor’s degree in English and Journalism from the University of Southern California.

Comments

  1. BY R. Emmett O'Ryan says:

    This is a great article. I’m glad you wrote this. This helps job seekers know what the “rules of the game” are. And it is a game that these recruiters play – a very unfair game.

    Recruiters actually count on applicants NOT knowing how to “play the game” so it makes it look like they are doing their jobs.

    • BY R. Emmett O'Ryan says:

      BTW as a hiring manager, this is one game that I personally find unethical and offensive. It’s for that reason that I at least scan the “secondary pile” of resumes for a rec.

      I do usually find gold and it always leaves me wondering “so why are these recruiters here when they are not doing their job?” I sure wish they had performance metrics I could contribute to…

  2. BY Robert Murillo says:

    No wonder we are falling behind from other countries in the technical aspect; just look at everything you buy and you will see it is made in China, Malaysia, India, and other countries. What happen to the U.S. of A ingenuity? I have more than 40 years experience in the technical field and have worked for the largest companies in this country and the trends I have seen, as far as people is concerned, is that technical people are, for the most part, thinkers and not social people but when it comes to solve problems they are the best. So, what does a company want? people who solve problems and with good ideas or social people who gather drinking coffee talking about sports? If I am a CEO, I would go for the brainy people instead of social-able people. Being at this point retired, I don’t care much about looking for jobs but now and then I get contacted regarding “contracts” with a job description which make me laugh. Now, I can see the trend of what it was in the technical arena and what it is now and no wonder our youth can care a less going to college and take a technical curriculum and so we continue falling behind technically and scholastically across the board.

  3. BY Alex says:

    In secrete #8 you should have run your own advice through spell check:

    “…but kulling stale resumes can,,,” The correct word for this is “culling”, not “kulling”.

    • BY Alex says:

      And I should have checked my own comment for spelling errors also before I posted it (i.e. secret not secrete).

  4. Pingback: 84 percent are kicking the tires? « JohnPalcisko

  5. Pingback: When to Ignore a Recruiter | Mint Resumes

  6. BY Mike says:

    Frae the blog:

    Secret No. 5: They Read Resumes from the Bottom Up

    Some recruiters read resumes from the bottom up to evaluate a candidate’s career progression, so make sure your resume conveys a compelling story from either direction.

    My comments/questions: so, where to place education? In the middle? What if your resume is read by a person who reads top/down?

    Like Max said; it seems getting your resume beyond first base is a roll of the dice.

    • BY Brian says:

      Sorry I’m late to the party. I’m sure it won’t go over well, but I am a recruiter. I’ve been in workforce development for 10 years. Here is some advice. Be sure to write a resume specifically for each position if possible. In regard to education: if your education is more relevant to the position you’re applying for than your experience, or if you’ve just graduated, put it at the top. If your experience is more relevant put it at the end. Hope this helps.

  7. Pingback: The Top Secrets of Corporate Recruiters | n0t3

  8. Pingback: What Cat Found When Looking Inside a Recruiter’s Head | Dice Blog Network

  9. BY Max says:

    This article proves once again that for most of us (and them, interestingly enough) getting hired (and hiring) is mostly a numbers game.

  10. BY Marcus Griffen says:

    Companies are not hiring people who have been out of work for over 6 months, no matter what there qualification are. I wish dice would do an indepth story about the average IT worker by job search. In fact better still Dice should select an IT worker, perhaps and unemployed poster to this site, and using the techniques/advise given by dice blogger see if this person can get a job. Follow that persons progress and report on it. Now, that would be a story.

    • BY TR says:

      I’d be happy to volunteer for such a story. I think I would be a good candidate because I’m an older worker *and* I just got my degree, so I cannot be accused of not being up to speed on “current” technology.

      • BY Mark Feffer says:

        TR, I’d love to talk to you. I’ll reach out.

        Mark

      • BY TR says:

        Mark, Alice or whomever else would like to chat with me: I can be reached at trothaar@gmail.com. I really want (and need) to improve my situation.

      • BY Mark Feffer says:

        Thanks, TR. I’ll email you today.

      • BY Marland Kennedy says:

        I came out with this ideal a few weeks ago and posted it in a another article. I would like to participate in such and article, I’m from the Chicagoland area and you could see if your advise would work in other regions of the country.

      • BY Mike says:

        TR,

        You are not alone. I was “recently” by the Boston Globe about that very issue; “older workers”. What puzzles me, as I told the interviewer, it was frequently my “legacy” knowledge that enabled my employer to meet the needs of its clients. As far as “current” technology goes, I more than once successfully debugged code written in a language I did not use.

        I wish you success !

        Mike

    • BY Alice Hill says:

      That is a great idea. Love it!

  11. Pingback: Dirty little secrets of recruiters… « Geektastic

    • BY Brian says:

      I AMA recruiter and your guys are unfortunately right about the age issue. Companies aren’t supposed to do it, but they still do. My advice to job seekers that fit into an “older” category is to remove dates from your resume. Most hiring manager only use dates to demonstrate longevity. It’s much easier to remove them and let it be something of substance that eliminates you from a position rather than age

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>